A new metaphysics; a more sensible explanation to life and existence as we experience it.

( 3016 words)

So far human wisdom could not attribute the cause of wars, racial and other prejudices, crimes etc to any particular feature of human nature. So naturally, no remedy was in sight.

The only remedy that we could prescribe was adhering to morals and ethics. A remedy as confusing as the evil it targeted.

This is an attempt to see if certain specific features of nature instilled, human 'sense of self' behind all evils in the world. If they are, why so? Why man is here waging wars, kill each other, rape, hates and indulge in mass exterminations like what Hitler did?   

Perhaps man is not here in life to please a God almighty as religions believe. This idea will be clear and makes good sense if we leave the aura of divinity around God concept. Conceptualizing substance of life as a mission to achieve moral heights makes no good sense. It will appear nonsensical before our basic, inherent sense of Reason. How can an almighty God be desirous of worship or virtuous deeds from his so-called army of created beings, humans? Won’t it be equal to making him silly, narcissist and pompous?

We should admit that the story of science is also equally naive and nonsensical. She claims life is rather a zero-sum game, an accidental occurrence in the fundamentally physical world.

The following link explains a nutshell story of science on the origin of life: http://bio1510.biology.gatech.edu/module-1-evolution/origin-of-life/

On the origin of the universe, following link ( a speech by Stephen Hawking) is provided as a sample: http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.html

Stories of science on the origin of the universe and life ‘childish’ like that of religions!

Science goes by the principle of 'evidence'. She finds no evidence for any basic sense and meaning of life, though her definition of 'evidence' is very subjectively her own. We know the concept of evidence of different species in air, water and earth would be unimaginably different. Evidence of dog may not be in line with that of an octopus in the sea. But men of science believe, his pieces of evidence have universal validity. 

Science doesn’t even have any final idea, how a man could make the certainty of his beliefs. He seeks evidence only for hypotheses formed by him. How we could form sharp, to the point truth and goal of existence is yet unknown to science.

If open minds pay unbiased, objective attention to stories of science on the origin of world and life, it should shame similar stories of religions! Stories of science are in fact sillier than that of religions!

In a nutshell, the route of both parties, religions and science, is single directional, or in plain language, 'dogmatic'.

West lost her patience with the authoritarian ‘belief’ system that the Church had established. Perhaps that impatience had compelled her to invent a system that was totally opposite to ‘belief but based on measurable evidence. It was not born from a calm mind of introspection, but out of anger and frustration, a kind of adolescent rebellion.  

Let us now try to know how our 'sense of self' mechanism has been set by Nature,  causing wars and other evils of the world. It might have a relation to the WHY question, as she might have set it in such a way that she will achieve her ultimate goal from humankind.  

No doubt, we all experience a strong sense of 'self', a kind of distinct separateness from others. Our experiences, relations, possessions etc are fiercely our own. What causes this irrefutable, fierce ‘sense of self?

Science claims, it is the result of the brain's circuitry features. Nature wants every living being to be capable of surviving, so she has helped with this sense of self to achieve her aim. This claim, based on Darwin's survival theory, suffers from serious metaphysical and logical fallacies. No unit of life, whether man or amoeba, found ever conscious of its survival need, achieved by acts of mutation. Living beings are passive victims of changes in their environment.

So, they are unaware of how to physically change themselves or mutate, for better survival. They, of course, have the will to survive, but such 'will' never heard to cause automatic changes in their reproductive cells so that it passes such gene needs to their off-springs. If it happens, it is the sole work of Nature, who caused first the environmental changes that compelled mutation. An external force is what first causes environmental changes and create the need for mutation and survival.

The act of attributing evolutionary needs to individual units of life, hence fallacious and illogical. The following paper might throw a good light on this: https://leadingdogmasthatruletheworld.blogspot.com/2012/08/leading-dogmas-that-rule-contemporary.html

If survival based evolution is not the most sensible explanation for a man having a fierce sense of self and its protective urges, what else? We are trying to answer a very complex question. It is closely related to our most fierce urge, the urge ‘to be’. How do we attempt ‘to be’?

A peep into the WHY question of life

The answer is simple, but perhaps difficult to grasp for it's over simplicity. We try ‘to be’, by self-expressing ourselves! Like the fierce self-protection urge of the body, we have a similar, fierce protective urge to protect our ‘sense of self’ also. Many wars of the past have happened to ascertain own free sense of self and identity. When a man tries to protect his body, it is more to protect his sense of self.

 The first step in developing a sense of self is to create one. We all carry the most fundamental urge to express ourselves for this purpose. When I express myself, what I gain? I try to create myself in you. I try to constitute my ‘being’ or self-identity in you. No one possesses any pre-knowledge, who he/she is. He/she gains it when he/she expresses himself/herself before others. One usually perceives himself as an entity only when he perceives it as the image of him in some ‘other’s mind. The way he expressed before others become his self-identity./image. What self-image one carry depends upon what ‘other’ he considers as central in life. If it is one of his worst enemies, then his self will be ‘revenge’ oriented. If someone treats him as inferior and thrash, he might develop a very revengeful sense of self!.

At many times, there would be pre-images in the world, like words, that carry powerful images, say like that of kings, warlords, criminals, saints and leaders. If one happens to develop his sense of self-taking cue from any such images, which is very usual, the world will have to bear with many Hitlers, Idi Amin and other similar cruel peoples’ leaders. This sense of self-mechanism also can lead one to self-express in ways of known smugglers, religious leaders, saints, moral men, war-lords, underworld dons, killers, terrorists and thieves.

This phenomenon is very similar to the usage of words; images and concepts mould first in the form of already existing, ready-made words and images. Behaviour has close similarity to words; many men follow existing behaviour patterns. A terrorist can mould his ego in line with the well-formed ‘image’ available outside in the world. Look at the recent Mosque attack in Christchurch, New Zealand; the white supremacist might have moulded his sense of self (ego) in such wild form, akin to that of other similar men world is familiar with.

Here his logic is his own logic; an intense hatred for ‘migrants’ who share white nations’ resources. What is ‘right’ here by some established, alien standards is immaterial to him. He and his fellow terrorists had formed their own logic here. Common logic is nothing but that based on a common universal premise. There is no means at the disposal of man today to know and establish what the ultimate truth of life and existence! So, men and communities form own logic, that at times are extremely dangerous to others and communities.

Why ‘self’ of man was schemed to be singularities?

Coming back to our discussion on self-expression, the purpose of my self expressing before you is that I want you to understand me and to recognize me. If I fail in this basic urge, I become frustrated and even violent. Your act of refusal or reluctance to recognize me and accept me is a kind of negating my existence. It creates serious existential conflicts in me. I might try to lead the world and people, like Hitler, to wage wars, defeat everyone and prove that I was right!

We all know the deepest act of self-expression is to be in love. When I am in love with someone, it is the deepest opportunity for me to deep express myself. If my love culminates in physical lovemaking, it is the ultimate satisfaction of my urge to be. When two persons engage in sex, it is the most intimate self-expression! It is the closest ever self-expression possible. That is why LOVE sways man the most. It is related to one's most intense existential urge.

We have no better logic to understand the most basic urge to existence. If my most basic intention in life is to make myself known, to be known by others by my self-expression, it might have been the basic intention, the very logic of existence too, ie, in the act of having us here, along with flowers and million other types of living beings, what existence might have intended is, to have her self expressed the maximum. When I attain my most complete self-expression, it might be existence who shares her ecstasy with me.

We could create any physical object. Most difficult to task is to create truly KNOWING beings. Perhaps for AI scientists, this might be their most difficult to achieve the task. 

We are familiar with the frustration and anger when the other person refuses to understand and recognize us. We get angry and many times, even violent!

The following paper on these fundamental existential URGES set by nature inherent in us might explain the subject in detail: http://unrecognizedobjectsofthemind.blogspot.com/2013/07/existential-drives-of-man.html

About our 'sense of self' mechanism, the following specific paper gives a complete picture:  

http://unrecognizedobjectsofthemind.blogspot.com/2018/09/self-and-identity-we-can-not-understand.html

Following specific paper on 'why life' question might explain it in more detail: http://newphilosophyoflife.blogspot.com/2018/05/why-life-why-existence.html

Another paper link on the subject of 'why' question also is shared here, so that the subject becomes very clear to readers: http://thewhyquestionofexistenceanswered.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-logical-inevitability-of.html

Each human person is empirically under existential laws to be a SELF. This sense of self of humans is under natural laws similar to physical objects under gravity like natural laws. One of the central features of this sense of self-mechanism is its fierce urge of 'singularity'; each one will experience its internal pull to be himself. Singularity means, like the gravitational internal pull each physical object encounters, like atoms are under inherent pull to be its natural structure always with a nucleus at the centre and electrons on the orbits, every living unit also carries similar inner pull to be itself always. 

Without such an internal pull, the individual identity of objects will be non-existing. We know, atoms ensure the chemical nature of molecules by their internal gravitational pull to be itself at all times.

Here are some passages on the structure of atoms to prove the point:

“Now, consider the attraction and repulsion properties of the nucleons-the proton-neutron centre of atoms. Its attraction is active only when other nucleons come close to it-say, the distance equal to 2 to 3 times their diameter. At lesser than this distance, ie. if other nucleons approach each other closer than the above limit, the reaction becomes negative; instead of aggregating the attraction, it shows a propensity to strongly repulse them! Nucleons cannot come closer than the above distance. This way, the nuclear force keep nucleons in an extremely stable manner, in an equally dynamic equilibrium. This repulsion factor is what gives matter its solid nature, and provide the links necessary to build up the molecular structures. They are also involved in the chemical reactions and are responsible for the chemical properties of matter" ( see link for reference purpose: http://patternsofapproachtodiscoverreality.blogspot.com/2014/06/rethinking-ultimate-stuff-of-universe.html)

Now the matter is clear. Wars etc are caused when humans are fiercely attached to their above explained 'sense of self'. They often face situations where they are totally cut off from all other realities, including, also perhaps especially with their link with existence, under the heavy influence of the singularity feature of their sense of self. They experience a kind of animal-like fierce, primitive urge to be itself, protecting its independence. Love to repeat share the following paper here,

(this link has been already been shared above once)  that explains this feature of EGO, the raw sense of self of man: 

http://thewhyquestionofexistenceanswered.blogspot.com/2015/03/how-could-we-explain-diseaseswars-and.html

Without this fierce sense of self, one will not achieve nature's sole goal of having him as an entity, an entity capable of having own 'experience' of life, a seeker of knowledge. Achieving a sense of self, hence is the primary goal of nature or existence out of life. More than survival, this is the primary need of Nature about a man. Survival perhaps is merely a silly story invented by science in the absence of any other sensible explanation as to the cause of life. 

Wars and all kind of mutual hatred serve the purpose of achieving this ENTITY need. It was a game of nature to create entities from virtual nothingness. We are selves exclusively to our social interactions.’ I am because you are’ could be the right theory, than that of Descartes'  'I think, therefore I am'.  

For real-world examples, take Modi’s India or Trump’s USA. Under Modi, the majority religion followers, Hindus, seems to have got a new sense of self. He spread the propaganda, that despite being the 80% majority in the country, Hindus are not ascertaining their deserving majority rights! Why they should remain equal to others when they have a natural right to be lords over others, the minorities? Like the German citizens under Hitler, the Indian majority is in a similar mood. They now got a new identity. Their sense of self has got a new twist.

Similar is the people in America under Trump. He promised to make America and Americans great again. Why she, being the most wealthy and powerful nation in the world, serve the interest of other nations? Why she should act as Cop of the world at her expenses? Why she remains a job provider to migrants from all parts of the world? Why Americans be for themselves alone? Majority of American citizens fell for his propaganda, like the Germans under Hitler!

Look at Europe. Many nations are now under a mass sense of  ‘white supremacism’. We have already discussed the recent Christ Church mass shooting at a mosque in New Zealand.  Such mass mindsets are similar to a similar sense of Muslims in the world. They are under the wrong belief that they are a marginalized lot in the world. Due to excess relevance of Christianity and other religions like Hinduism and Buddhism in certain nations, Islam not getting her due relevance and centrality. So, many of her followers have adopted means of terrorism to ascertain their rights by defeating, destroying their enemies. A specific paper explaining why Muslims tend to adopt terrorism more and more is here: https://closedmodernworlddespitedemocracy.blogspot.com/

All because of the self-glorification URGE of human ego, per its existential urge to be singularities. Ego wants to ascertain herself always, in relations, in mass vs mass dealings, and country vs country dealings.

We know why animals spent millions of years on earth attached to their primordial urges. They fought for territories and lived absolutely as their physical beings. Man too, when he is an animal as far as his primal 'sense of self' features are considered, readily enter into wars, crimes and all related evils exactly like animals!. 

We know that man evolved into non-animal, human, in a drastic mind evolution. Evolution is a reality when considered in its factors concerning mind, as explained in the following paper: http://metaphysicsofthehumansoul.blogspot.com/2013/02/spiritual-evolution-ofman-from-age-of.html

Yes, when a man is still caught up in his animal type ‘sense of self’, he is not different from any animal. In matters of waging wars, cruelty towards others, extreme selfishness, causing mass destruction etc, he will think and behave only like animals. A good majority of humankind today is still in the above-described animal stage of development. That is why we have no dearth of wars, war threats, social and racial bigotry abundantly in the world. There is no remedy other than mass mind evolution via proper education. Our institution of education is to evolve many folds, freeing her self from the teachings of science. Science, as all thinking men know, is a technology mission. She doesn't believe in sense of self-mechanism of humans. She believes, Nature is animal-like, and humans too are super animals but who learned to use hi-tech gadgets etc to make life better.

Has the picture become clear now? Existence wants knowing beings to ascertain themselves first, and turn independent knowledge entities. Only such fierce knowledge entities can develop questions like who they are etc within. Then only they will be able to strive for a deeper sense of selves. Abandoning their EGO priorities and turn themselves different self-identities, perhaps truly connecting themselves with larger reality of existence, as depicted in the above-given link on WHY life.

To achieve her above goal, she had no alternative but to let mankind and individual men undergo maximum chaos, wars, diseases, and similar turmoil. This is similar to millions of years mankind has spent in jungles as animals. This is now an advanced stage of her development.

So, the change in the world has no moral route. It has only a spiritual route; by individual men realizing their real ancestry by relating himself with existence directly.

It is establishing a new self-identity, new self-realization by all thinking men. This was what Nature or existence might have been waiting for long, centuries and ages!

Perhaps following paper on self-realization might throw more light on the theme: http://unrecognizedobjectsofthemind.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-crisis-of-human-consciousness.html

Authored by: Abraham J.Palakudy

He is an independent philosophy, mind, reason, polity and spirituality seeker and researcher.

His other blogs and brief profile are at, https://www.blogger.com/profile/14249415589712707293

Twitter account: Voice of philosophy@jopan1

Why life? Why existence?

Life; Existence's one and only 'means' to originate 'knowing' beings: 

Who and what is man? Why he is here in life? Is the story of Science, that universe and life are chance occurrences, an altogether 'physical' phenomenon, is convincing to our Reason? Is there 'sense' in life and existence?     

To answer the above questions, the inquiry must start from 'who' is the one that raises the question. Who are we? What gives us our sense of 'self', and what makes us ask this question?   

What we first take up would be, how, and on what ground man feels his independent 'sense' of 'self'? 

Had he any role in his 'chance' emergence in life as a self-conscious entity? He just 'happened' to born into life, without playing any role in it. So, his sense of being an 'independent' self is fundamentally 'irrational' in human terms of logic, as it doesn't have any ground! Noone's life belongs to him, be it the life of a man, an animal or a plant. We all were forced to 'own' our life on account of the smart ploys Nature had played!

Let us attempt to go deep into the very difficult question of 'how man started developing his sense of self'?

A sensible theory is there, and love to share it with all enlightened minds! 

It is based on the 'others' around us, who similarly feel the independence of their 'selves'! You are, hence I have to be also a similar 'self'. Wasn't it a very smart ploy of Nature or Existence to create the sense of 'self' in every living unit this way? By just making a man experiencing his sense of 'self' because of the similar 'owning ' of life by 'others' around him? 

Artificial intelligence now tries to create a sense of self in Androids. Following link says about their success. One Android was able to develop a 'consciousness' of herself! Means, sense of self is a 'synthetic' sense. It has nothing to do with any non-physical mystery. 

But the ploy used by Nature can't be called 'physical' in its science given meaning. We must find a new concept for such 'organizational' miracle or smartness of nature. Following blog-link will explain, how Nature or Existence was able to achieve this feat, by creating a sense-of-self in man, fundamentally working on its interpersonal dynamics: 

http://unrecognizedobjectsofthemind.blogspot.in/2017/05/the-physics-behind-birth-of-human-self-i.html

Can we, or Science, explain the above feat of Nature in the physical term? 

The 'other' in the story need not be always some persons. It could be any impersonal 'collective' of them too. Yes, the notion of 'WORLD' we live with is really the WOMB from where 'selves' of man usually take birth and then use it as a 'space' for its existence. Following blog-link will explain this unheard fact elaborately: 

http://selfandworldblogs.blogspot.in/2015/03/is-world-absolute-object-or-relative.html

This lack of any soul like 'essence' in its religious sense for human beings, at least in their normal walks of life, or at least at the present stage of their spiritual development, is evident from what we have seen about its quite 'empirical' origin. The sense of 'self' is a simple product of an interpersonal dynamics of the plans of Existence. 

Once we are convinced of the above, morality can have a new meaning. As Hindu scriptures say, death is of the body only. The soul never can be killed or harmed. That is perhaps, why millions of microbes, insects, animals and even men die in the world every moment of the day! Even when we breathe and walk, microbes die in the process. We can't prevent it. When Doctors give antibiotics to patients, it kills millions of disease-causing bacteria. Use of pesticides kills similarly millions of insects and their larva. Earthquakes, floods, and wars kill millions of men in the world. Man kills millions of chickens, goats, and other animals every day for meeting his food needs.

Every study reveals, even plants have life, and feels pain and anguish. Can we avoid the immorality of eating vegetables, use of antibiotics, and eating curd etc? Curd, as we know, contains millions of life-supportive bacteria. So, if God was a moral God, in the given human meaning of morals, He would have never allowed such a massive annihilation of life-units every minute of the day, that is, His own creation, even if what died was a 'false' sense of the 'selves' of these beings!  

So, death and harm, in nature's eyes, not a serious matter of moral or ethical violation. For Her, it has a different meaning that we do not yet know. Perhaps, she was the one responsible for giving life, and life, except the time-bound sense of 'ownership' given to all living beings by her, loss of life may not be a serious matter to her! Life, after all, is owned by her. We were fooled by her to believe, that we were the owners of it!

Units of life in the world simply experience only a synthetic 'sense' of life provided by her! So, their moral and ethics, imaginably less relevant to her, at least till these living units develop to a stage or a day when they will be able to share the sense of the 'miracle' of life with her, the way she looks at it! 

Now let us take up the sexual morality. We know in Western countries, having sexual relationships outside the marriage is a common practice. It is considered an immoral act only when personal commitments are broken, that is, when two partners in an intense love relation, and if one breaks the TRUST, then the other partner feels pain. In conservative non-Western communities, such relations are mostly kept secret. Issues arise only when someone is caught in the act. People experience no sense of guilt for such relations if things remain secret forever! Having four wives at a time is allowed in Islam. So, morality in sexual relations is, like in animal kingdom, does not seem to break any natural moral-law!

This might perhaps be blasphemous to religious ears, and difficult to believe! For most religious societies, God is ultimately a moral God. Another dimension of the story, out of question. It might shake traditional belief and faith. It might even force Science to rethink their own prejudice about God of the Religions; she so far has been feeling comfortable, that such a moral, Almighty God is not their cup of tea. It might now force her to review her stand and think further on the forces in Existence beyond her 'physical' dogmas.  

Next moral question is about the interpersonal acts of cheating and causing harm to others. We can observe a distinct factor here. One who keeps a certain sense of divinity about himself, or a sense of personal integrity and inner freedom within, will never attempt to harm others, physically or otherwise! The ones who were cheated in the past, their rights and sense of self-dignity violated and abused in the past, might have had lost their sense of morality, and might have had lost their reluctance to indulge in any such 'immoral' act. Such men always stand deprived of their sense of good and bad, whether society instilled or inherent, in their basic Nature.

Be it rape, corruption or stealing other's possessions, those who indulge in these anti-social activities have, at some point in their lives, might have had lost their sense of dignified self-hood. They have become like animals, exclusively living with their 'biological' instincts of self-survival. Love to share below a link, that explains TWO fundamental causes behind man's  adopting way of violence and rights abuse: 

http://understandinginflationinanewlight.blogspot.in/2015/04/how-exceptionally-one-could-be-free.html

Now, what conclusion we should arrive at from what has been observed above? That killing, rape, stealing and sexual immorality is permitted in society and lives?

Here comes the fundamental, spiritual or metaphysical question of what life is? Why we are here in life, as individuals, and in communities? Is Nature a dead phenomenon, or is there a 'mind' with certain likes and dislikes, intentions etc behind Existence? With certain predilections or predispositions of her?

 Why we are here in life, as individuals, and in communities? 

There may or may not be other intelligent beings elsewhere in the universe. But it shouldn't alter our basic conviction that the existence of each person is simply unique and central. There is nothing to compare the unique 'fact' of our Existence. Emerged from nowhere, (we don't know from where!) having been able to 'sense' an 'own self' in the course of life!  We often are forced to adopt the versions of our existing age and its past, as to what is life! Like the language we have learned from our parents and from our schools, we have also learned certain pre-set 'images' of ourselves and certain behavior patterns. We use it to play our pre-set roles in life. One day death comes to take us away. We have blindly accepted this inevitability too, as per our pre-knowledge about this end, learned from our age's/past generations' stories and myths.

But in between this role-play, at least for some of us, a burning awareness possess us, as to what is behind this 'role-play'? Who are we? What is existence? This burning awareness often leads us to realize the uniqueness of each life. A is A, and B is B. No two lives are alike and comparable. Individuals in their physical features, their circumstances of birth, circumstances of growing up, the company of others they get, education, relations, health, love, and finally death; each person maintains his uniqueness of entity and course of life!

Our science believes in 'objective' philosophy, that is, our wholesale identities have emerged from an objective universe as homogenous commodities. There exists, irrespective of all observers, independent reality of the world. She had her own physical, or energy level compulsions for the evolvement of us, human beings, and a similar compulsion for the emergence of our intelligence. It is due to this intelligence that we have become able to gather all the biological and physical information about us, and about the universe.

But often our said intelligence refuses to accept the above view of Science, and what we know as 'physical', that is, an inorganic something. Can a typical physical universe ever produce  'intelligence' from the blues? If that is possible by the 'inorganic' something, it can not be termed as something inorganic, dead and mindless matter, in it's popular, generally accepted meaning and sense!

These men with the above-narrated burning sense of 'self-awareness' often have an inner compulsion to doubt whatever is 'senseless' around them. The inner-compulsion they experience for 'sensible explanation' for everything is real, but it does not mean that fantastic stories similar to that of popular Science, or similar fantastic stories being taught by the various religions about the whole of existence etc should be blindly adopted/bought by them!

This hidden faculty of 'sense' is still not a fully known concept to man. Love to share with intelligent readers, as to what exactly is this hidden 'faculty of 'sense', and why it is a sign that Existence never wanted to conceal her secrets from man forever!

Kindly read with all seriousness, the contents of the following links: 

http://thesparkleofhumanreason.blogspot.in/2011/01/part-b.html

 ( this initial link has info about all other sub-links, and also on a book on the subject) 

My 'self' wouldn't have been known to me without your 'sense of self'. If one is born like Robinson Crusoe, without anyone around, still he would have other objects around him, from what he could realize his 'separateness' from others. A link that explains this unique plan of nature was already given above, that 

(http://unrecognizedobjectsofthemind.blogspot.in/2017/05/the-physics-behind-birth-of-human-self-i.html) 

explains Nature's ploy, or well-thought-out organizational plan behind the emergence of 'selves' in life.


What is the above-observed facts' possible relation with our concept of morals? 


Remember, you and I stand blessed with a 'sense' detecting Faculty. So, we are capable of arriving at the final 'sense' of Nature's leaving man here in life, using our inherent such faculty, with all the above-observed features, that is, the uniqueness of each individual, with his unique 'relation' with Existence, ( he is not an 'object' of any sort in existence) the nature of his primary 'self' originated from 'others' around him, and it's being 'synthetic' in this meaning, and finally, the absence of any 'objective' reality in the universe.

The most central observation was the relevance of all realities remaining null and void in the absence of sensible perceivers. Nature, when she has been observed as the ultimate abode of all the intelligence and sense in existence as far we can conceive, must be extremely anxious to have 'intelligent' and sensible 'knowers', or perceivers also in existence, so that her own being or reality becomes 'real'! We have seen that nothing can be 'real' without some perceivers being there, before whom they appear real! This mutuality of observer and the observed is a 'new physics' of Existence.

Take the plain example of human 'love-partners' to easily grasp this very difficult existential theory. They were two independent, unrelated individuals until they become love partners. 

Let us leave here the physics or biology of why man and women, or two homosexuals fall in love. Once the event of falling in love takes place, it is some kind of 'blossoming' of own life for both partners! The chief reason is, one starts getting perceived by the other as the most central object in his/her or life thereafter! He was the same person before and after, but after the falling in love, the way the partners look at own selves and each other, undergo a very different chemistry! Mornings and evenings, flowers, season, the cry of birds etc appear to them as divine! They long for each other every moment of their wake life. The touch of the other becomes magical. Kisses, just divine!

All these might not be true with the modern, exclusively sex oriented love relationships, wherein partners are in relationships only to enjoy physical sex abundantly, without any trace of the above described 'love' angle. But, it is sure, in the first encounters between two mutually attracted persons, both will experience the above magical movements! 

What was the cause of such 'altering of the selves' in love entanglement? The different kind of 'perception' by the other changes the image of own-self. This is not an imaginary, highly speculative theory as far as the very metaphysics of existence is concerned. Existence, for her to be real, she needs intelligent knowing entities to perceive her in her wholesomeness!  

This might be an extreme opposite view of the 'objective' viewpoint of classical science. For her, as we know, attributing anything beyond 'physicality' to anything in existence is sheer blasphemy! This new proposition might take away the very ground of classical science, and also that of classical religions. Yes, mankind and her knowledge system badly need a revamp, and certain new dichotomies.

It is here that we will look at the 'moral and ethics' factors in life.  We see here a certain specific aim of Nature or Existence of life. It is all about causing the emergence of independent, knowing, intelligent entities! To achieve this end, she has schemed to keep every person in a unique set-up of life, in every respect. We have seen above, details of this uniqueness of each person and his/her life.  

For Existence, those men/women who have not established a very sensible, direct relation with her might be similar to inorganic matter to her, lifeless and relevance-less. For establishing such a very sensible relation, one has to transform himself into an enlightened entity, transcending himself/herself from his/her 'ego' level self-identity. Only at such transcended stage, that human entities become real living beings in her eyes, as she too attains her sense of BEING meaningfully revealed! Then only she achieves her existential goal!

Some plants and trees blossom only once in one or two decades. Similar might be nature's willingness to wait for ages and centuries for a few human being to turn enlightened, and then again after so many centuries, the entire human race becomes capable of transcending from their ego stage. Then perhaps, Nature might be wishing that the entire human society lives in a living relation with her, moment to moment!!

The ultimate onus of living his life fit the ways of Existence is entirely on the shoulders of the individual himself. Society is not an objective reality. It has no independent existence or entity, except its mystery role like the role of the false sense of EGO for individuals. World notion or the 'collective' notion is, hence the exact replica of the false sense of the 'self' that man experience.(above given link to the blog on the 'WORLD' may be referred once again; http://selfandworldblogs.blogspot.in/2015/03/is-world-absolute-object-or-relative.html)

So the content of his 'consciousness', or the events in his/her life have no fixed pattern. If this is the truth, won't the thousands of various theories, 'isms' and terminology-jargons philosophy and psychology have produced to name different mental states, their acquisition methods, factors etc turn garbage level knowledge? Nature's exclusive goal is to evolve 'knowing', independent beings from this exercise. She never wanted to have 'robots' in life, but let the waiting be, for many centuries and ages, but her insistence on independently emerged enlightened entities was final. 

Moral and ethics were not her 'primary' goal, but it is not that she never wanted men to evolve-out from moral-less animal stage. She seems to have set moral and ethical laws in a very different way. When man emerges as an independent entity, a fully enlightened knower who grasp his/her integral tie with existence, transcended from his synthetic 'sense' of ego-self, feels an inner compulsion to be moral and ethical! The primary and exclusive condition for the evolvement of this moral and ethical man is, that he remains absolutely free, liberated and independent, free of all controls over his 'self' by any external social or political institution or agency!

In other words, when humans are free in every respect, free spiritual beings, they will be under severe compulsion to observe moral and ethical principles; as outlined in the following blog-post:  

http://archaeologiesofthefuture.blogspot.in/2017/04/how-ought-to-we-live-are-there-inherent.html 

If we look closely at the development of man's evolvement from his animal stage to the stage of a social being and then an individual, it shows this clear existential direction. Kindly view this blog-post that describes this very empirical stages of development: 

http://metaphysicsofthehumansoul.blogspot.in/2013/

So, the ultimate goal of mankind is to evolve into ideal societies wherein men can turn really independent, free, mutually respecting spiritual beings! Morals and ethics will the hallmark of such societies. They are inherent in Nature itself but it will bless human being only when she/he turns truly free and independent. This newly learned direction of Nature might prove the old theory of 'survival of the fittest', naive. 

An important 'new physics' on how entities emerge, is hidden in the above organizational plan. To be in existence, one needs to have an 'other' to perceive it/him! Please do not confuse this theory with Bishop Berkely's theory that, nothing exists outside some one's perception. He had a clue to this theory, but he seems not fully explained it. Nature's organizational plan for whatever that exists involved a perceiver's special eye and mind. Without my eyes, sun, in her popular human image, would not have its existence. It is first and foremost formed as an object of man's eyes. It must be some other subjective object in the sense organs and mind of an alien in a different corner of the universe!

Latest Scientific finding, her Quantum theory, very specifically spells out this existential fact. Quantum theory had long ago discarded the 'objective' philosophy of classical science, who believed in the existence of an 'objective' world 'out' there, independent of any observer. But, classical physics is not yet temperamentally ready to fully adopt the said theory, as it takes away the very ground she has been standing for long!

But the evidence presented by the Quantum physicists are very strong; they showed that measuring the velocity of a subatomic particle is almost impossible, ignoring its energy level interaction with the 'observing tool' of man! In other words, events do not happen independently of the observer in cosmos. He is always a partner in every object/act he observes. Knowledge is impossible outside this 'observer-observed' dichotomy! Means, man's every knowledge is nothing but his collective subjectivity.

Kindly be patient; we shall arrive at it at the end of this deliberation.

Here, both the partners turn new 'beings' in such love relations! Love will stand, without doubt, the most swaying emotion for every human being! 

Consolidation of what has been said above

1) It is not a moral or Almighty God who is behind existence: We have seen that what Existence seeks is to be TANGIBLE and REAL, by having more and more enlightened beings in existence, knowing each other; she is not interested in morals and ethics directly. But when enlightened beings emerge, and when they acquire/share the basic divinity or reverence about the miracle of existence, they always turn moral and ethical. It is the natural state of existence!

2) Existence stands devised by her, using her CREATIVE CHOICES, that is, divided into its 'structure' and 'essence' dimensions Following blog-post is a dedicated one, that explains what is structural and 'essence' realms: 
http://patternsofapproachtodiscoverreality.blogspot.in/

Structural is the physical universe, with its own self-working laws. It was essential for having a kind of 'tangibility'. Living units had been provided with suitable 'sense' organs to perceive this tangible part of existence. This realm has its own self-working laws, perhaps cause-effect ruled. When man and animals are not enlightened, they are not different from who is in the non-conscious structural realm, as explained in the following blog-post:

http://thewhyquestionofexistenceanswered.blogspot.in/2015/03/how-could-we-explain-diseaseswars-and.html

3) Existence is kind of 'indifferent' to morals and ethics, it should be believed ( we have seen evidence of frequent annihilation and emergence of life every moment! ) until man develops into enlightened beings, and acquires 'LIFE' in its real meaning! ( see the following blog:

http://thewhyquestionofexistenceanswered.blogspot.in/2017/08/can-ego-ever-know-of-itself-real.html)

When humans acquire LIFE by being enlightened, sharing the sense of the miracle of existence, they naturally adhere to morals and ethics, as they are in the most natural state of the fact of existence.   

4) For world and individuals to be moral and ethical, what our socio-political institutions MUST remember is to keep every individual FREE and liberated. Like when plants are groomed providing them adequate sunlight, water, and manure, they naturally produce abundantly! The following paper was sent to the father of Indian Metro rail, Dr.E.Shreedharan in 2008 when he and Ratan Tata, India's top industrialist together had initiated a 'VALUE inculcation' drive in the country. He replied this author, appreciating the arguments presented: http://valueinculcationandstate.blogspot.in/

In other words, morality and ethics naturally arise within individuals when he is FREE, enjoying civil, political and personal liberties. Man’s collectives must be formed solely and exclusively to ensure the above central goals, and it should not at all for meeting any other purpose. We know that today’s governments of man are NOT formed to meet the above spiritual and metaphysical needs of man, but that of professional men and groups who desire to keep the entire citizens of the country under their control, often enforcing their ideologies and idiosyncrasies upon them! This is the chief threat to the natural evolution of man and mankind into moral and ethical communities!

We have read through a complete philosophy of life, as to what is life in the world, the end purpose of mind and self, what is the difference between the 'structural' and 'essence' realm of existence, and finally, the source of our morals and ethics. 

Comments of enlightened minds are politely solicited.

Authored by: Abraham J. Palakudy

He is an independent seeker and researcher in the fields of Mind and Reason, philosophy and metaphysics, spirituality, democracy, and polity

email contact: ajoseph1@rediffmail.com

Twitter: Voice of philosophy@jopan1

His profile and other blogs: https://www.blogger.com/profile/14249415589712707293